GTM Partners
Get Started

GTM Partners Research · Landscape guide

B2B Go-to-Market Frameworks and Methodologies

Where each popular framework fits, and how it connects to the Go-to-Market Operating System™ (GTM OS)

Summary

There is no single “best” B2B GTM framework because different methodologies solve different problems. April Dunford is widely used for positioning; MEDDIC, MEDDICC, MEDDPICC, Challenger, and SPICED help with sales execution; Winning by Design addresses revenue architecture; Geoffrey Moore helps with market adoption; EOS and OKRs help with execution. The Go-to-Market Operating System™ (GTM OS) connects these specialist methods across the broader company-wide GTM system.

  • Different frameworks solve different problems. Most B2B companies use several at once, at different layers of go-to-market.
  • GTM OS is not another sales methodology. It is the operating system that connects Product, Marketing, Sales, Customer Success, RevOps, and executive leadership, so specialist methods can plug into it.
  • Keep the work you already have. Existing positioning, sales methodology, or revenue architecture becomes an input into GTM OS, not something to replace.

All Frameworks at a Glance

Select any framework to jump to its write-up and how it connects to GTM OS.

Figure 1 Popular B2B go-to-market frameworks, grouped by the problem they solve
CategoryFrameworksPrimary job
1. Market, ICP & Market SelectionDecide where to play and where to focus
2. Positioning, Messaging & CategoryClarify differentiated value and how the market should understand it
3. Demand, Account Strategy & GTM MotionsDetermine how buyers engage and how demand is created
4. Outbound, Social Selling & Pipeline CreationBuild repeatable prospecting and pipeline-generation systems
5. Sales Methodology, Discovery & QualificationImprove qualification, discovery, deal execution, and conversion
6. Revenue Architecture & Customer JourneyConnect acquisition, retention, expansion, and recurring revenue
7. Product-Market Fit & Growth StageUnderstand stage, repeatability, adoption, and readiness to scale
8. Company Operating Systems & ExecutionTurn priorities into accountability and execution

Source: GTM Partners

How GTM OS Relates to These Frameworks

A B2B company might use Geoffrey Moore to think about market adoption, April Dunford for positioning, ABM for strategic accounts, MEDDPICC for qualification, Challenger for commercial conversations, Winning by Design for recurring-revenue architecture, and EOS for company execution. Those methods are not necessarily competitors. They operate at different layers of go-to-market.

The Go-to-Market Operating System™ (GTM OS), developed by GTM Partners and introduced in the book MOVE, connects those layers. It does not replace specialist expertise. It helps the executive team answer the questions around it:

  1. Are we solving the right problem?
  2. Are we focused on the right market?
  3. Are we investing in the right product and Revenue Model?
  4. Is the specialist work connected to the rest of the company?
  5. What should we actually prioritize next?

Each write-up below uses the same four fields: what the framework is best for, when to use it, what to watch out for, and how it fits with GTM OS.

Market, ICP & Market Selection

The question these frameworks answer: Where should we focus?

Before optimizing positioning, pipeline, sales, or expansion, leadership has to make choices about market, ICP, product, and investment.

In this section: TAM / SAM / SOM · Geoffrey Moore — Crossing the Chasm · Geoffrey Moore — The Bowling Alley · Geoffrey Moore — Zones to Win · Jobs to Be Done

TAM / SAM / SOM

Origin: Widely used market-sizing concepts rather than a single proprietary methodology

Best for
Estimating the theoretical size of a market.
Use it when
Leadership or investors need to understand the scale of the opportunity.
Watch out for
Confusing a large theoretical market with the part of the market the company can actually win now.
How it fits with GTM OS

TAM helps show the size of the universe. TRM helps leadership determine where inside that universe the company should actually focus.

Connects to Total Relevant Market (TRM).

Geoffrey Moore — Crossing the Chasm

Created by: Geoffrey Moore

Best for
Understanding the transition from early adopters to mainstream buyers in technology markets.
Use it when
A company has early traction but struggles to create repeatability in the broader market.
Watch out for
Assuming success with visionary early adopters automatically translates to pragmatic mainstream customers.
How it fits with GTM OS

Moore explains the market-adoption challenge; GTM OS helps translate it into company-wide decisions.

Connects to TRM, GTM Partners 3Ps framework, product investment, positioning, and Revenue Models.

Geoffrey Moore — The Bowling Alley

Created by: Geoffrey Moore

Best for
Choosing an initial beachhead and expanding deliberately into adjacent markets.
Use it when
The business needs greater focus rather than trying to address an entire market at once.
Watch out for
Expanding into adjacent segments before the initial market is sufficiently repeatable.
How it fits with GTM OS

Moving from a beachhead into neighboring segments is the Adjacent Niche Expansion move in GTM Partners’ Category Expansion framework.

Connects to TRM, 3Ps, Market Investment Map, Revenue Models, and Category Expansion.

Geoffrey Moore — Zones to Win

Created by: Geoffrey Moore

Best for
Managing competing priorities between the current business and future growth.
Context
Moore’s four zones are Performance, Productivity, Incubation, and Transformation. GTM OS does not rename those zones. Instead, GTM Partners’ Market Investment Map provides a complementary way to make product, segment, and GTM investment choices inside the company’s broader operating system.
Use it when
Leadership has to allocate resources across mature businesses and emerging opportunities.
Watch out for
Treating every initiative as if it deserves the same operating model and investment expectations.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Market Investment Map, product strategy, leadership prioritization, and 90-Day GTM Planning.

Jobs to Be Done

Associated with: Clayton Christensen and subsequent practitioners including Bob Moesta and others

Best for
Understanding the progress customers are trying to make when they choose a product or service.
Use it when
Customer research, product decisions, segmentation, or positioning are being driven too heavily by demographics or features.
Watch out for
Generating strong customer insight without translating it into actual market, product, and GTM choices.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to TRM, product strategy, Brand & Demand, Customer Time to Value, and Revenue Models.

↑ Back to the full list of frameworks

Positioning, Messaging & Category

The question these frameworks answer: How should the market understand why we matter?

In this section: April Dunford — Obviously Awesome · Christopher Lochhead / Category Design · Robert Wright / Firebrick · StoryBrand · Command of the Message

April Dunford — Obviously Awesome

Created by: April Dunford

Best for
Rigorous B2B positioning based on competitive alternatives, differentiated capabilities, value, ideal customer fit, and market context.
Use it when
Customers do not immediately understand why your solution is different or who it is best for.
Watch out for
Completing excellent positioning work while Product, Sales, Demand, and Customer Success continue operating from a different strategic context.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Brand & Demand, TRM, product investment, Revenue Models, Pipeline Velocity, and Customer Time to Value.

Christopher Lochhead / Category Design

Associated with: Christopher Lochhead and the broader Category Design movement, including the ideas popularized through Play Bigger

Best for
Defining a new problem, challenging an existing market frame, and shaping how buyers understand a category.
Use it when
The opportunity is not simply to position against existing competitors but to change the frame of reference itself.
Watch out for
Creating an ambitious category story that the product, sales motion, customer experience, and investment strategy cannot support.
How it fits with GTM OS

Category Design helps a company define and win a category. GTM Partners’ Category Expansion framework, from the book MOVE, helps leadership decide which category moves to make as the company grows from a point solution toward a platform. Category Design thinking matters most in the Emerging Categories and Established Categories moves, where buyers need a clear category point of view.

Connects to Brand & Demand, product investment, TRM, Revenue Models, Leadership & Management, and Category Expansion.

Robert Wright / Firebrick

Best for
B2B positioning and buyer-centric market narrative.
Use it when
The company needs deeper clarity around its buyer, problem, differentiated value, and market story.
Watch out for
Assuming a messaging problem is necessarily a positioning problem. Sometimes the real constraint is ICP, product strategy, executive alignment, or GTM execution.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Brand & Demand, TRM, Revenue Models, Pipeline Velocity, and customer value.

StoryBrand

Created by: Donald Miller

Best for
Simplifying a message so customers can understand it quickly.
Use it when
The underlying strategy is sound but the company communicates it in an overly complex or company-centric way.
Watch out for
Making the message clearer without first determining whether it is aimed at the right buyer or centered on the right problem.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Brand & Demand, ICP, positioning, and customer-value communication.

Command of the Message

Associated with: Force Management

Best for
Connecting sales messaging to customer problems, required capabilities, differentiation, and value.
Use it when
Sales needs a more consistent and value-oriented commercial narrative.
Watch out for
Enabling sellers around a message before leadership has resolved fundamental market, product, or positioning questions.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Brand & Demand, Pipeline Velocity, Revenue Models, and Customer Time to Value.

↑ Back to the full list of frameworks

Demand, Account Strategy & GTM Motions

The question these frameworks answer: How should buyers engage with us?

In this section: Account-Based Marketing · Sangram Vajre & Bryan Brown — The TEAM Framework · Product-Led Growth · Chris Walker / Demand Creation · Gartner B2B Buying Journey

Account-Based Marketing

Origin: An established B2B strategy with many practitioners and platforms rather than a single universal methodology

Best for
Focusing Sales and Marketing on a defined group of strategically important accounts.
Use it when
Account value, buying complexity, and market concentration justify higher-touch engagement.
Watch out for
Building sophisticated account programs around an ICP or account list that leadership has never rigorously validated.
How it fits with GTM OS

GTM Partners’ own account-based framework is TEAM (Target, Engage, Activate, Measure), covered next.

Connects to TRM, Brand & Demand, Revenue Models, Pipeline Velocity, and TEAM Framework.

Sangram Vajre & Bryan Brown — The TEAM FrameworkGTM Partners framework

Created by: Sangram Vajre and Bryan Brown, who popularized it during their time at Terminus

Best for
Running account-based marketing (ABM) and account-based experience (ABX) as one operating model across Marketing, Sales, and Customer Success: Target, Engage, Activate, Measure.
Use it when
Account-based is the right motion, and Sales, Marketing, RevOps, and Customer Success need to work the same accounts with shared plays and shared metrics.
Watch out for
Running TEAM as a marketing-only program. It works when Target is built on a validated Total Relevant Market and Measure is shared by the whole leadership team.
How it fits with GTM OS

Each TEAM step maps to a GTM OS pillar: Target to Total Relevant Market, Engage to Brand & Demand, Activate to Pipeline Velocity, and Measure to RevOps.

Connects to TRM, Brand & Demand, Pipeline Velocity, and RevOps.

Read the full TEAM framework →

Product-Led Growth

Best for
Using the product itself as a major mechanism for acquisition, adoption, conversion, and expansion.
Use it when
Users can experience meaningful product value with relatively low friction.
Watch out for
Treating PLG as the entire company strategy rather than one GTM motion that may coexist with sales, partners, inbound, outbound, events, or community.
How it fits with GTM OS

Product-Led is one of the six GTM Motions used within the GTM OS Revenue Model.

Connects to Revenue Model.

Chris Walker / Demand Creation

Associated with: Chris Walker, including his earlier work at Refine Labs

Best for
Shifting Marketing away from lead-volume thinking toward demand creation, buyer behavior, dark social, and revenue impact.
Use it when
Marketing generates significant activity but weak business outcomes.
Watch out for
Optimizing demand-generation execution before leadership has resolved market focus, ICP, product priority, or positioning.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Brand & Demand and Pipeline Velocity.

Gartner B2B Buying Journey

Associated with: Gartner research on complex B2B buying behavior

Best for
Understanding that B2B buyers do not move neatly through a simple linear funnel and often revisit buying tasks as groups.
Use it when
The company’s commercial process assumes buyers progress in a predictable seller-defined sequence.
Watch out for
Understanding buyer complexity without changing the internal GTM system to accommodate it.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Brand & Demand, Pipeline Velocity, Revenue Models, and Customer Time to Value.

↑ Back to the full list of frameworks

Outbound, Social Selling & Pipeline Creation

The question these frameworks answer: How do we execute it well?

In this section: Morgan Ingram / AMP Social · John Barrows / JB Sales · Predictable Revenue · Mark Roberge — The Sales Acceleration Formula

Morgan Ingram / AMP Social

Best for
Modern outbound, social selling, buyer signals, LinkedIn prospecting, and relevant multi-channel outreach.
Use it when
Outbound is strategically appropriate but reps need better ways to identify, engage, and create conversations with buyers.
Watch out for
Getting significantly better at prospecting into the wrong segment.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to TRM, Outbound-Led GTM Motion, Brand & Demand, and Pipeline Velocity.

John Barrows / JB Sales

Best for
Practical B2B prospecting and sales execution.
Use it when
Strategy is sound but rep-level execution, prospecting, discovery, or deal progression needs improvement.
Watch out for
Treating a strategy problem as a seller-skill problem.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Pipeline Velocity and Revenue Model.

Predictable Revenue

Associated with: Aaron Ross

Best for
Specialized outbound prospecting and the SDR/BDR operating model.
Use it when
The company has a defined market, identifiable accounts, and economics that justify a dedicated outbound function.
Watch out for
Scaling SDR infrastructure because it worked historically, even when the market, economics, or buying behavior has changed.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Outbound-Led motion, Revenue Models, TRM, and Pipeline Velocity.

Mark Roberge — The Sales Acceleration Formula

Created by: Mark Roberge

Best for
Building a more measurable and scalable sales organization through hiring, training, management, and demand generation.
Use it when
A company has found repeatability and needs to professionalize how the sales organization scales.
Watch out for
Scaling the machinery before the underlying market and Revenue Model are sufficiently repeatable.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to 3Ps, Pipeline Velocity, RevOps, and Revenue Models.

↑ Back to the full list of frameworks

Sales Methodology, Discovery & Qualification

The question these frameworks answer: How should sellers understand, qualify, advance, and close them?

In this section: BANT · MEDDIC / MEDDICC / MEDDPICC · Challenger · SPICED · Sandler · SPIN Selling

BANT

Associated with: IBM

Best for
Simple qualification around Budget, Authority, Need, and Timeline.
Use it when
The sales team needs a lightweight way to assess basic commercial viability.
Watch out for
Rejecting valuable opportunities too early because modern buyers may not have established budget or a fixed timeline before meaningful discovery occurs.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Pipeline Velocity and Revenue Models.

MEDDIC / MEDDICC / MEDDPICC

Origin: Developed at PTC in the 1990s and associated with practitioners including Dick Dunkel and Jack Napoli; later variants expanded the framework

Best for
Qualifying complex, multi-stakeholder B2B opportunities.
Use it when
Forecast accuracy, complex buying processes, opportunity quality, or deal discipline are major constraints.
Watch out for
Qualifying deals perfectly in the wrong market or segment.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Pipeline Velocity and Revenue Models.

Challenger

Created by: Matthew Dixon and Brent Adamson through CEB research

Best for
Teaching customers something new, reframing their thinking, tailoring the commercial message, and taking control of the sale.
Use it when
Sellers need to lead stronger commercial conversations rather than simply respond to stated buyer requirements.
Watch out for
Asking Sales to challenge the customer when the company itself has not established a differentiated point of view.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Brand & Demand and Pipeline Velocity.

SPICED

Created by: Winning by Design

Best for
Customer-centered discovery around Situation, Pain, Impact, Critical Event, and Decision.
Use it when
Sellers need a consistent method for understanding the business context and urgency behind an opportunity.
Watch out for
Improving discovery without fixing poor ICP, positioning, or upstream demand.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Pipeline Velocity, Customer Time to Value, and Revenue Models.

Sandler

Created by: David Sandler

Best for
Consultative selling, disciplined qualification, mutual commitment, and uncovering pain.
Use it when
Sellers spend too much time chasing weak opportunities or fail to establish strong buyer commitment.
Watch out for
Assuming every performance issue is caused by sales technique.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Pipeline Velocity and Revenue Models.

SPIN Selling

Created by: Neil Rackham

Best for
Complex discovery using Situation, Problem, Implication, and Need-Payoff questions.
Use it when
Sellers need a more disciplined way to understand the business consequences behind customer problems.
Watch out for
Treating excellent discovery as a substitute for strong market, product, and positioning choices.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Pipeline Velocity and Customer Time to Value.

↑ Back to the full list of frameworks

Revenue Architecture & Customer Journey

The question these frameworks answer: How should acquisition, value realization, retention, and expansion work together?

In this section: Winning by Design — Bowtie · Forrester / SiriusDecisions Revenue Waterfall · Elena Verna / Reforge — Growth Loops

Winning by Design — Bowtie

Created by: Winning by Design

Best for
Visualizing and managing the recurring-revenue customer journey beyond Closed Won.
Use it when
Leadership needs a more complete view of acquisition, onboarding, adoption, retention, and expansion.
Watch out for
Creating a strong lifecycle architecture without resolving the market, product, Revenue Model, or executive-priority decisions surrounding it.

Forrester / SiriusDecisions Revenue Waterfall

Associated with: SiriusDecisions, later acquired by Forrester

Best for
Creating shared definitions and measurement across demand, Marketing, and Sales progression.
Use it when
Teams disagree on what constitutes demand, qualification, progression, and pipeline.
Watch out for
Creating precise funnel definitions around a Revenue Model that is strategically weak.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Pipeline Velocity, RevOps, and Revenue Models.

Elena Verna / Reforge — Growth Loops

Associated with: Growth practitioners including Elena Verna and the Reforge ecosystem

Best for
Understanding repeatable systems where the output of one growth action becomes an input into future growth.
Use it when
The company wants to move beyond one-directional funnel thinking and identify compounding acquisition, engagement, or expansion mechanisms.
Watch out for
Optimizing loops before the underlying customer value and product-market fit are strong enough to sustain them.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to 3Ps, Customer Expansion, Customer Time to Value, Revenue Models, and RevOps.

↑ Back to the full list of frameworks

Product-Market Fit & Growth Stage

The question these frameworks answer: What stage are we actually in — and are we ready to scale?

In this section: Marc Andreessen and Product-Market Fit · Sean Ellis Product-Market Fit Test · Geoffrey Moore and Market Adoption

Marc Andreessen and Product-Market Fit

Best known for
Popularizing Product-Market Fit as a central startup and growth concept.
Context
The term predates Andreessen and is commonly traced to Andy Rachleff; Andreessen helped popularize it through his 2007 writing.
Use it when
Leadership needs to determine whether the business has found enough market pull to justify scaling.
Watch out for
Treating PMF as a vague badge rather than a measurable change in business behavior.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to GTM Partners 3Ps framework.

Sean Ellis Product-Market Fit Test

Created by: Sean Ellis

Best for
Measuring how strongly users value a product through the “very disappointed” survey question.
Context
A commonly cited benchmark is 40% or more of respondents saying they would be “very disappointed” if they could no longer use the product.
Use it when
Leadership wants a simple signal of product indispensability among users.
Watch out for
Treating a single survey score as sufficient proof of repeatable GTM.
How it fits with GTM OS

Product-Market Fit within the 3Ps framework.

Connects to 3Ps.

Geoffrey Moore and Market Adoption

Best for
Understanding how buying behavior changes as innovations move through stages of market adoption.
Use it when
The company has traction but struggles to understand why growth does not transfer uniformly across different customer groups.
Watch out for
Scaling a GTM motion before the company has demonstrated sufficient repeatability in the target market.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to 3Ps, TRM, Market Investment Map, and Revenue Models.

↑ Back to the full list of frameworks

Company Operating Systems & Execution

The question these frameworks answer: How does leadership turn strategy into a repeatable operating rhythm?

In this section: EOS / Traction · OKRs · Scaling Up / Rockefeller Habits

EOS / Traction

Created by: Gino Wickman

Best for
Company-wide clarity, accountability, meeting cadence, issue solving, and execution discipline.
Use it when
The organization needs a broader company operating system.
Watch out for
Assuming the operating cadence itself determines the right GTM strategy.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Leadership & Management and 90-Day GTM Planning.

OKRs

Origin: Associated with Andy Grove at Intel and later popularized broadly by John Doerr

Best for
Aligning teams around objectives and measurable outcomes.
Use it when
Leadership knows what matters and needs a structure for focus and measurement.
Watch out for
Creating excellent OKRs around the wrong GTM priorities.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Leadership & Management and 90-day operating rhythm.

Scaling Up / Rockefeller Habits

Created by: Verne Harnish

Best for
Broader company scaling across people, strategy, execution, and cash.
Use it when
Growth is creating organizational complexity that requires greater management discipline.
Watch out for
Expecting a general company operating system to provide all of the specialized GTM decisions required across Product, Marketing, Sales, Customer Success, and RevOps.
How it fits with GTM OS

Connects to Leadership & Management and 90-Day GTM Planning.

↑ Back to the full list of frameworks

Where to Start

You do not need all of these frameworks. The better question is not “which frameworks have we not implemented yet?” but “what is actually preventing the company from achieving its goals?”

If the problem is already clear, go straight to the specialist. If positioning is clearly the constraint, do deep positioning work. If qualification is broken, strengthen MEDDPICC, SPICED, or the methodology you already use.

Start with GTM OS when the root problem is unclear, multiple functions are involved, leadership disagrees about the diagnosis, previous fixes have not worked, or specialist work needs to be connected back into the business.

Figure 2 The visible problem is not always the root cause
What looks like…May actually begin with…
A pipeline problemMarket selection
A sales problemPositioning
A churn problemPoor-fit customers entering the business
A demand problemProduct strategy
A positioning problemAn executive team that has never agreed on which market matters most

Source: GTM Partners

Next step

If your leadership team is not sure which part of the GTM system needs attention, start with a GTM Diagnostic and Planning engagement. A Certified GTM OS Partner works with your leadership team to find the root GTM constraints, decide where specialist work is actually required, and build a focused 90-day GTM plan.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the best B2B go-to-market frameworks?

The best framework depends on the problem being solved. April Dunford is commonly used for positioning; MEDDIC, MEDDICC, MEDDPICC, Challenger, SPICED, Sandler, and SPIN address different aspects of sales execution; Winning by Design focuses on recurring-revenue architecture; Geoffrey Moore addresses market adoption; ABM and PLG address GTM motions; and EOS, OKRs, and Scaling Up support broader company execution. GTM OS connects those specialist methods across the company-wide GTM system.

Is GTM OS another sales methodology?

No. GTM OS is an organization-wide go-to-market operating system connecting Product, Marketing, Sales, Customer Success, RevOps, and executive leadership. Sales methodologies can operate inside it.

Does GTM OS replace April Dunford, MEDDPICC, Winning by Design, Challenger, EOS, or other specialist frameworks?

No. GTM OS is designed to complement specialist methodologies, not replace them. It helps leadership determine where those methods fit, what problem they should solve, what surrounding GTM decisions need alignment, and how the work connects to the broader business.

What if we already invested in one of these frameworks?

Keep the work. Existing positioning, sales methodology, revenue architecture, market research, operating systems, and GTM programs can all become inputs into GTM OS. The objective is to increase the value of work you have already done, not restart it.

Do we need to implement every methodology on this page?

No. This page is a landscape of approaches companies may use. One of the purposes of GTM OS is to help leadership determine which specialist investments are actually necessary.

Should we start with GTM OS or a specialist methodology?

Either can be correct. If the problem is already clear, go directly to the appropriate specialist expertise. If the root cause is unclear, spans multiple functions, or leadership is not aligned on the diagnosis, GTM Planning can help determine what the company should address first.

How is GTM OS different from Winning by Design?

Winning by Design is particularly focused on recurring-revenue architecture, sales methodology, and the customer journey. GTM OS operates across the broader executive GTM system, connecting market selection, product investment, positioning, Revenue Models, Pipeline Velocity, Customer Time to Value, expansion, RevOps, and leadership. They can work together.

How is GTM OS different from MEDDICC or MEDDPICC?

MEDDICC and MEDDPICC help sellers qualify complex opportunities. GTM OS addresses the broader system that determines which markets to pursue, which customers to target, which products to prioritize, which GTM motions to run, and how the company delivers and expands customer value.

How is GTM OS different from EOS?

EOS is a broader company operating system. GTM OS specializes in the company’s go-to-market system across Product, Marketing, Sales, Customer Success, RevOps, and executive leadership. A company can use both.

What is the fastest way to determine which framework or methodology our company needs?

Start by diagnosing the business problem rather than selecting a methodology first. A GTM Diagnostic and Planning engagement is designed to identify the root GTM constraints, align the leadership team, and determine where deeper specialist work is likely to create the greatest impact.